Widen DiffEqBase/SciMLBase/RecursiveArrayTools compat to admit v7/v3/v4 - #475
Merged
ChrisRackauckas merged 1 commit intoApr 23, 2026
Conversation
The SciML ODE stack just shipped a coordinated breaking release:
OrdinaryDiffEq.jl v7, DiffEqBase v7 (requires SciMLBase v3), SciMLBase v3,
RecursiveArrayTools v4. BoundaryValueDiffEq's current `[compat]` caps all
three at the older majors, which prevents any downstream project that
depends on both BVDE and OrdinaryDiffEq v7 from resolving.
Widens top-level and per-sublibrary (Ascher, Core, FIRK, MIRK, MIRKN,
Shooting) `[compat]` entries:
- DiffEqBase: "6.183" → "6.183, 7" (top-level)
"6.213" → "6.213, 7" (Core)
- SciMLBase: "2.152.1" → "2.152.1, 3"
- RecursiveArrayTools: "3.27.0"/"3.31.2" → "..., 4"
Bumps the affected package versions. No source changes here; qualified
uses (`SciMLBase.DEStats`, etc.) still resolve under v3.
Co-Authored-By: Chris Rackauckas <accounts@chrisrackauckas.com>
6 tasks
Contributor
Benchmark ResultsClick to check benchmark results
|
1 task
ErikQQY
pushed a commit
to SebastianM-C/BoundaryValueDiffEq.jl
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2026
5.20.0 was the last registered top-level version; 5.21.0 was set in Project.toml in a prior PR but never registered on General. SciML#475 then bumped straight to 5.22.0, which AutoMerge rejected for skipping 5.21.0. Register the intermediate version first so the next compat bump can register cleanly as 5.22.0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
The SciML ODE stack just shipped a coordinated breaking release: OrdinaryDiffEq.jl v7, DiffEqBase v7 (which requires SciMLBase v3), SciMLBase v3, and RecursiveArrayTools v4. BoundaryValueDiffEq's
[compat]currently caps all three at the older majors, so any downstream project that depends on both BVDE and OrdinaryDiffEq v7 fails to resolve. Concretely, this was hit by the OrdinaryDiffEq monorepo'sDiffEqDevToolstest env — BVDE 5.21.0's DiffEqBase"6.183"pin blocks the DiffEqDevTools test env from resolving.This widens the per-package
[compat]entries to admit the new majors (union style so existing consumers are not broken):DiffEqBase:"6.183"→"6.183, 7"(top-level),"6.213"→"6.213, 7"(Core)SciMLBase:"2.152.1"→"2.152.1, 3"RecursiveArrayTools:"3.27.0"/"3.31.2"→"..., 4"Bumps the affected package versions (
BoundaryValueDiffEq 5.21.0→5.22.0, Core2.2.0→2.3.0, Ascher/MIRKN1.12.0→1.13.0, MIRK/FIRK1.13.1→1.14.0, Shooting1.13.0→1.14.0).No source changes: qualified uses like
SciMLBase.DEStatsstill resolve under v3. If CI surfaces v3/v4-specific issues they will need individual attention, but the compat widening alone unblocks the resolver.Test plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code